Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
Firstly let me say that, l have always said that IF BT Sport arrived on VM, l would have no objections in paying extra for it, BUT not £12.00 per month - that is too expensive for three channels.
Secondly, we had a similar problem with Sky over the Basics (look how long we waited for that to appear) and now atlantic, Sky have said countless times that, the channel Atlantic has been offered to VM at a reasonable price, but won't give it away.
Sky is a business on how to make money - l will say again - VM want channels on the cheap, at the end of the day ITS US THAT END UP PAYING FOR IT.
So doesn't VM sit down with Sky and BT Sport and sort out this mess, or are the directors of VM playing golf all day.
I think Monday morning there will be a lot of angry VM customers calling the customer services asking to be released from the contracts. Due to the present BT Sport problem. On this forum there must be quite a customers that are mad football fans - like me - and will go to another supplier for its football.
|
There are so many contradictions in your post that I don't even know where to begin.....
So you'll pay for it, but not what BT want to charge for it, and somehow this is VM's fault?
If you go to Sky, you will have to pay £12 per month, but you have said you won't pay this - how do you square that circle, Arthur?
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|