Quote:
Originally Posted by saabmania2
Hmmmm not sure where you get this from currently BT are taking Sky through the courts and ofcom are investigating the prices Sky are quoting they want from BT for sky sports channels on the BT Vision platform, they are far from liking each other infact your statement couldn't be further from the truth.
Sky had no say who puts channels on the satellite so BT Sports on Sky was always going to happen
Virgin Media is different as the platform is solely owned by Virgin and nobody can put channels on without agreeing a deal with Virgin hence the deals taking longer (if at all)
|
Please correct me if I am wrong. But Sky did not need to have BT sport on their EPG.
It is on, but suspect that Sky have seen no reason to irk their customers who will get BT sport, by not having it on.
So as he says, not seeing so much a relationship, but more necessary evils (i leave it to you to speculate whether both are evil, neither are, or one is
---------- Post added at 09:18 ---------- Previous post was at 09:15 ----------
i voted yes.
Mainly as I had considered Virgin as an alternative, wholly as ESPN was free. Sport seems to dominate my viewing these days, and whilst I like sky atalantic, I also believe you should occasionally change companies (i hate relying on anyone)