Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
In short, I shall try and explain the salient point of my post again. Sometimes information that we receive is information that we should not really be privvy to and it doesn't do to go asking too many questions. Due to the very nature of the information involved, you are unlikely to get any answers, no matter how much you pry and much of this information is unlikely to be found on the internet or anywhere else.
If the subterfuge involved in obtaining and sharing some pieces of information has no credibility in your eyes because it cannot be verified, then so be it 
|
"In short"! Brilliant.
So, in short, it's insider information and for reasons of confidentiality you're unable to say anything more. That's all I needed to know, thank you very much.
Now, whilst accepting that you will not be able to divulge any sources, can you explain why the information you are apparently privvy to is the exact opposite to the explanations given by the company themselves?
For example, the following is Virgin's official line on ESPN:
"BT now owns the ESPN and ESPN HD channels, so you’ll only be able to watch this content on Virgin Media until 31 July 2013. We’re currently talking to BT about showing these channels after this date."
This information is taken directly from the Virgin website.
Whereas you've said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
VM have a contract to pay ESPN for their channel until the end of the contract, whilst ESPN have a contract to supply ESPN in return for payment.
The takeover by Liberty doesn't change this legally binding agreement, as long as ESPN still exists as an entity. BT can't close down ESPN because of the requirements of various unexpired sports rights.
|
If I've read your posts correctly, you're saying that Virgin and ESPN have an agreement that isn't changed by the fact that the ESPN business is now owned by BT and Virgin has been taken over by Liberty. But Virgin themselves are saying that since BT now own the ESPN channels they won't be able to show them unless they come to a new, separate agreement with BT.
My question to you, quite simply, is this: Is the information on the Virgin website, bearing in mind the importance of it being correct, wrong?