View Single Post
Old 28-07-2013, 18:55   #2051
RichardCoulter
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,941
RichardCoulter is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2013) Vol. 3.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginMediaPhil View Post
Apologies if this has been mentioned already, but something new to Virgin Media today at least. A new off air screen, check BBC Three before 7pm. It looks like it's designed for HD though as the text is a bit small for standard definition (which is what it's going out in).
Interesting observation Phil, I wonder if this is in preparation for the impending arrival of BBC Three HD?

Quote:
Originally Posted by young_timbo View Post
well we know which 3 or 4 posters are to blame for that. I said so a few days ago and got accused of being a sock account when 2 other newbs agreed with me. could be, i dunno, because i'm not the only person who thinks so? IP check me if you want. I had never heard of this place before 2 weeks ago I come here for a heads up on the BT Sport situation. it's a rubbish forum because too many people cracking inside jokes to eachother intead of being on topic. you think something has happened when you see 50 new posts but it's 3 pages of 3 or 4 mates inflicting their terrible banter on us all.

msn messenger would be a good shout. or a little device which you could type into, select a phone number, and message the person with required unfunny inside joke. you could call it a mobile phone, and the typing could be called text messages. shame nobody has ever thought of this before. it would be an idea worth billions!
This thread has special dispensation to wander off topic within reason, but I do sympathise with your point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy_m View Post
All that's being asked of you is to provide a source for your information, or, if you cannot, to explain why that is not possible. None of what you have posted about ESPN is backed up by the companies involved as far as I can see - in fact, most of it appears to have been contradicted by official statements and advertising. It may well be that I've got that wrong, if so I'd be grateful if you were to point me in the right direction.
In short, I shall try and explain the salient point of my post again. Sometimes information that we receive is information that we should not really be privvy to and it doesn't do to go asking too many questions. Due to the very nature of the information involved, you are unlikely to get any answers, no matter how much you pry and much of this information is unlikely to be found on the internet or anywhere else.

If the subterfuge involved in obtaining and sharing some pieces of information has no credibility in your eyes because it cannot be verified, then so be it

Quote:
Originally Posted by young_timbo View Post
take it to MSN then if it's so light hearted. at least make a thread for crap unfunny homoerotic banter and let them go to town on eachother.
If by homoerotic you mean the practice of referring to other men as "master", I think it's an in joke.

I doubt it means anything to do with the BDSM scene :-D
RichardCoulter is offline