Thread: Should VM and Sky be worried?
View Single Post
Old 25-07-2013, 11:40   #3
Sirius
Grumpy Fecker
 
Sirius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 66
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 17,105
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Re: Should VM and Sky be worried?
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankysmagicpian View Post
Not strictly VM news so feel free to move it.

Talk-Talk have announced today that they have increased their 'budget' (presumerably You-View) subscribers in the last quarter by 160,000.

With traditional pay-tv new subscriber levels plateauing, is it time for the big players to be worried? Maybe we have now passed the glory days and boom times for pay-tv.

I can honestly see You-View and FreeSat now making serious inroads to VM and Skys subscriber base in years to come.
Not at all as i would sooner have VM - Sky - Bt in that order than the crap that is talk talk
__________________
Do yourself a favour and ditch Microsoft and their Spyware infested OS
I am a happy Linux user

https://nobaraproject.org/
Sirius is offline   Reply With Quote