View Single Post
Old 29-06-2013, 16:26   #2311
Arthurgray50@blu
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news

I think that Sky is by far the best concerning cost of their channels.

If they are putting up the average cost by £1.00 for the year, why is VM ripping off customers by charging more.

I would have thought that VM would have reduce prices to accommodating customers.

Sorry it does not make sense when all these customers are figting it out for for the best service. And yet they dont know who to choose.

I am seriusly thinking of going back to Sky and just have the normal service, which would be far cheaper than VM.
Arthurgray50@blu is offline   Reply With Quote