Quote:
Originally Posted by coulsontom
I was guessing with Arshavin, even worse then. Broke golden rule: never sign a player off back of a good tournament if shown nothing before.
I know they had to get someone in instead of santos (why sign him in that strange rush of signings at end of summer window 2011) but did they need him on permanent deal?
I meant they hate him being at City not him. He's a legend at Arsenal. And also did well in 18 months at City too, helping us in the FA Cup win as he played most of the games in that run.
|
actually Arshavin proved to be a good investment at the time, he kicked us on to get CL. then it was incredibly hit and miss to a state of uselessness
I dont know why Santos was chosen. the guys a fool.
'Apparently' Paddy hasn't always been on best terms with Arsenals officials. To me its because he has a loud mouth. That conflicts with Wengers dictatorship, his way of running things etc. the AST have had it confirmed by 'leaks' that Arsene runs the show at Arsenal who is now joined by incompetent Ivan.
---------- Post added at 21:44 ---------- Previous post was at 21:43 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by colin25
No..my point is that falcao has been going everywhere...depending on what paper wants to make up a headline
Pure speculation by papers without foundation
And my point was..in any other type of news story..it would not be allowed...but for football..they just use it to sell papers...what would make a good headline
|
can I just say I was right about Falcao
