Quote:
Originally Posted by thenry
Arshavin, 8m? where did you get that from. Hes Arsenal record signing 15-20m
Rosicky has proven to be very useful. on the whole I don't know but as expereince, extra legs yeah. finding out his wage has been a problem.
You going through the whole squad. we all know whos good enougha nd who isnt but thats another issue in itslef.
Nachoman was signed becasue Santos sucks, we'd have a better chance playing a corpse at left back than him. Gibbs got injured. Tommy was out. the injuries were mounting up quick, Arsenal had no choice but to move early. plus the Nachoman transfer was going to happen in the summer anyway, it was moved forward to January.
No Arsenal fan Ive seen hates Paddy as a man for being at City but they do dislike the fact he isnt at Arsenal.
|
I was guessing with Arshavin, even worse then. Broke golden rule: never sign a player off back of a good tournament if shown nothing before.
I know they had to get someone in instead of santos (why sign him in that strange rush of signings at end of summer window 2011) but did they need him on permanent deal?
I meant they hate him being at City not him. He's a legend at Arsenal. And also did well in 18 months at City too, helping us in the FA Cup win as he played most of the games in that run.
---------- Post added at 21:36 ---------- Previous post was at 21:35 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
But Falcao is a perfect example. He has been linked to a move away for years based on this talents and the team he plays for. It was bound to happen eventually.
|
Chelsea forever linked with him after his 4 goals against them.
I would believe that Chelsea enquired after him like all top players, clubs who have finances are all interested. Especially as Chelsea are light up front.