Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
Well it or depends what you think value is as many believe Virgin overall are much better value then Sky are but other people might think differently.
|
When you say "overally value" though, what do you mean?
Here's our cold facts:
current package:
Virgin TV XL, Sky Sports & Movies, ESPN, Broadband 100mb, full Unlimited Phone, 1 x Tivo, additional V+hd.
Cost: £113.99
Sky package:
Sky World, Sports & Movies(full HD), Full Phone, Unlimited 20mb bb (no throttling), additional HD box.
Cost: £107
Virgin pro's: 3 tuners on TiVo, recording facility on multiroom box, faster bb, ESPN.
Sky pro's: Atlantic, full HD F1 & Sports & Movies on demand.
Sky's multiroom won't let you record but we never record on extra box anyway.
ESPN is going, and we never get the full BB speed.
The only benefit to Virgin therefore, is the 3 tuners.
---------- Post added at 16:15 ---------- Previous post was at 16:15 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat
Because there are far more aspects to consider when choosing a service provider than purely content and price. Therefore it is not a 'simple' decision.
I find posts that claim it is 'simple' irritating.
|
Such as what?
hope you don't say customer service. As it's crap no matter who you get your services from.
Not being antagonistic on purpose btw!