[MovedGoalPosts]

Anybody else think it is unfair that people are named when they have simply been questioned and not even charged, yet alone convicted? Yes the alleged offences are serious. Yes by naming someone there is a probability that others may come forward. But, trial should be in court, not the media, and whatever we may say, mud sticks and once "outed" in public the stigma will remain, even if no further action is taken.

I'm not surprised therefore there are rumours of super-injunctions.