View Single Post
Old 10-04-2013, 22:00   #366
harry_hitch
Heavens to Betsy, Bertie!
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cambs
Services: TIVO, M TV, L BB, M Phone
Posts: 1,094
harry_hitch has reached the bronze age
harry_hitch has reached the bronze ageharry_hitch has reached the bronze ageharry_hitch has reached the bronze ageharry_hitch has reached the bronze ageharry_hitch has reached the bronze ageharry_hitch has reached the bronze age
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2013) Vol. 2.

[QUOTE=colin25;35559582]I'm puzzled, when did on comment on you? Or is it some defensive mechnism

Ok caught up. (had to hop back a few threads)
Yup, that's what I did when I saw your reply to my post (as I do every time I have missed a days worth of writing on here). At least I had the decency to be polite, ask a civil question and even agree with a point you made

You viewed the one or two comments I made about SA, as being exclusively the reason to choose sky...wrong assumption.

No, I did not. I simply pointed out that SA should offer more than 3/4 programs for the channel to be considered the extra cost it may or may not cost VM

what I said was i wouldn't choose virgin while they don't have it...as their package for tv isn't worth it (atlantic is missing).

I am pretty sure you originally said it was due to the broadband not being worth the money, but I am happy to be corrected, fyi, I actually agreed with your point on content providers, please read my posts properly.

Noting the balance question. But understandable you being confused.

Do you mean my asking you to explain your comments on me being a VM fan boy? If you don't have the decency to answer a valid question (clearly you are not intelligent enough to do so) Perhaps you can explain why I am confused?

And caught up again. you viewed my comment to chad, about his comment, as exclusively for you.

Nope, not your comment to Chad, just the mention of various VM "fanboys" when they are actually few and far between. Nearly all the posters on here are very balanced, many Sky owners ( including MM and Chad) are very fair as are Dave42 and Denphone

You really think i am commenting to just you? Perhaps better if you concentrate on your own threads and comments, be less confusing for you.

When you quote in a post and respond directly to that post, yes, I think you are commenting to me. I do believe I am also able to comment on other posts from other posters on this forum, that is what it is for.

Further caught up.. my original comment was on the "Why Atlantic to maggies comment re fox".

I genuinely do not know why you have bought this up, I have not referenced it at all in any of my posts to you

Brother, now I'm worried about you..straight jacket time I think, can I help you with putting it on?

Please do, it would be nice to get some time off work

I am not sure why you have chosen to respond the way you have to my response. I thought I asked a fair question in which I gave you the option to respond intelligently. Instead you have chosen to respond rather petulantly, perhaps you do not like being challenged? Anyway I do not come on here to engage in this tit-for-tat. I look forward to your response, but I will not respond to you on this topic (unless you give me an intelligent response with valid questions)[QUOTE]
harry_hitch is offline