Quote:
Originally Posted by harry_hitch
Fair enough, my point was if SA is so good why are there only 3/4 shows you recommend, when many other channels offer a similar amount of shows and are readily available on most providers? (not just VM  )
How was I being a "fan boy?" I was simply pointing out I am glad VM are not putting my prices up for this channel alone. Am happy to pay extra for all the recent arrivals that others may watch more than me, but if I had to pay £1, £2 or £3 extra just for Atlantic, I would not be happy. I did also say I agree that people should be to pay a subscription for Atlantic, if they want it, something VM have failed to offer it's customers. So I refer you back to my original question - How was I being a "fan boy?" 
I sense from a few of your posts you are trying to be a bit of a wind up merchant.
You are correct abut the provider though. VM offer the better option for me. |
I'm puzzled, when did on comment on you? Or is it some defensive mechnism
Ok caught up. (had to hop back a few threads)
you viewed the one or two comments I made about SA, as being exclusively the reason to choose sky...wrong assumption.
what I said was i wouldn't choose virgin while they don't have it...as their package for tv isn't worth it (atlantic is missing).
Noting the balance question. But understandable you being confused.
And caught up again. you viewed my comment to chad, about his comment, as exclusively for you.
You really think i am commenting to just you? Perhaps better if you concentrate on your own threads and comments, be less confusing for you.
Further caught up.. my original comment was on the "Why Atlantic to maggies comment re fox".
Brother, now I'm worried about you..straight jacket time I think, can I help you with putting it on?
