Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut
I think they should cut child benefit first. Or means test it to a point in line with the means testing of other welfare benefits. Basically if you're not claiming any benefits because you're in work then you shouldn't be getting child support. Or limit it to 1 child max.
|
Yes great idea, families with children struggling to make ends meet who would probably be better off on benefits should not be allowed child support. But those who don't work should be allowed child benefit, Housing benefit, Council tax benefit.
What a stella plan, children see mom and dad working hard to give their kids the best should now suffer because their honest hard working parents refuse to quit work and get EVERTHING paid for them.
This whole, make benefit life more comfortable than working for a living is bull, cut benefits for none workers to an absolute minimum needed for the basics. How about that?
So far you've said ATOS are basically useless as they might cut benefits, and child benefit should be stopped. But your benefits should be untouched?I guess you think you should never have to work, you have the typical "entitlement" selfish mentality of a long term benefit claimant. You don't care what happens or who is effected as long as YOU don't have to go to work.