View Single Post
Old 06-12-2004, 16:48   #27
ian@huth
Inactive
 
ian@huth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huthwaite, Nottinghamshire
Services: VM 10Mb, TU, 1xSky HD, 2xSky+ (HD,all packs, sports & movies) 2xDVD PVR's, Freesat Freeview & other
Posts: 4,536
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
Re: Will NTL ever catch up with Sky?

Quote:
Originally Posted by themelon
The charge for Sky Sports is determined by the wholesale cost. Which OFCOM approved after previously finding unfair............this was over 2 years ago, so is now outdated Sky have started 6 xtra sports channels since.

Sky make a minimum of 90% from every ntl Sky Sports Subscription.

So Sky are charging about 20 quid wholesale for sports and movies, this is still too much (especially when we dont over half of the football)

ntl need to be ble to make a mark up of some kind to make it worthwhile evn having the channels.

The majority arent really bothered about the channels, most of the worthwhile paid channels are in both family pack, it generally free special interest channels which you can get free anyway that are extra (except in a few cases) The major channels are on both.

Please post the links where you obtained those figures from. I doubt that Sky have ever published any such detail.

It is rather presumptious to say what people want to watch and what they aren't bothered about. I would imagine that NTL have cutomers for the God channel (otherwise why carry it) which costs £6 extra on NTL but is free on Sky.
ian@huth is offline   Reply With Quote