View Single Post
Old 20-02-2013, 17:18   #45
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: report calls for an experimental 20% tax on all sugary soft drinks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
I know - but my point is, there is a fundamental ideological difference between reducing State intervention, whether by tax or by benefit, and increasing it. In very simple terms, the more State a government creates, the more Left that government is. Hence my contention that taxing a food or drink not because it is inherently harmful, but because of a belief that certain people can't be trusted not to harm themselves with it, is essentially a nannying, leftist position.
Well, a bigger state may be leftist, but I'm simply not convinced that that 'the left' is more nannying than 'the right'.

Nanny away, Dave:

Quote:
Ministers are proposing a minimum price of 45p a unit for the sale of alcohol in England and Wales as part of a drive to tackle problem drinking.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-20515918

Quote:
UK could introduce 'fat tax', says David Cameron
Prime minister says 'fat tax' could help prevent health costs soaring and life expectancy falling
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...-david-cameron
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote