View Single Post
Old 20-02-2013, 16:01   #41
Osem
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Re: report calls for an experimental 20% tax on all sugary soft drinks

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf View Post
No doubt you'll have noticed that I said 'more impartial' rather than impartial. Wikipedia entries are not (usually) written by one person. Texts like these are discussed between editors until they are in agreement it's a fairly balanced. Anyone disagreeing is free to chip in. That doesn't mean there is no bias, but the likelihood of extensive bias is considerably lower than with one bloke writing a blog for the Telegraph.



Tax system as a whole, yes. In terms of using a levy to deter unwanted behaviour I'm not so sure. What was that Bedroom 'tax' again?

Incidentally, I'm not so sure how obesity relates to 'social change'


They're gonna tax bedroom antics now are they?
Osem is offline   Reply With Quote