Quote:
Originally Posted by Top banana
This has been said a number of times. Sky could supply services to 25 million homes and have over about 10.5 million customers. Vm could supply services to 12 million homes and have about 4.8 million customers. The big difference is in those 12 million homes VM compete with Sky, BT and every other tom dick and harry, whreas Sky do not have VM as a competitor in 13 million homes that they could potentiallly serve.
Looking at it like that you can see what a great job VM have done. I appreciate that they have an off net product but they simply do not push this - have you ever seen an advert?
So Bogof post is complete garbage actually all of his posts are!
|
Why wouldn't they do well for many years they've had BB speeds Sky could only dream about , going back a couple of years they'd people on speeds such as 10mb , 20mb and 50mb when the average ADSL user was probably managing around 4-5mb , the next few years will be interesting with Sky now being able to deliver Unlimited Fibre to a larger footprint that's expanding day by day and BT Vision set to shake its TV service up and offer trully unlimited Fibre BB.