Quote:
Originally Posted by jamiefrost
So what you are saying is that both companies have a hit rate of around 50% of possible customers. The other thing to consider is that it can only make Sky's figures worse if Virgin extended to cover all of the UK.
No point just trying cast Virgin Media in a bad light again.
J
|
This has been said a number of times. Sky could supply services to 25 million homes and have over about 10.5 million customers. Vm could supply services to 12 million homes and have about 4.8 million customers. The big difference is in those 12 million homes VM compete with Sky, BT and every other tom dick and harry, whreas Sky do not have VM as a competitor in 13 million homes that they could potentiallly serve.
Looking at it like that you can see what a great job VM have done. I appreciate that they have an off net product but they simply do not push this - have you ever seen an advert?
So Bogof post is complete garbage actually all of his posts are!