View Single Post
Old 05-02-2013, 11:32   #11
Maggy
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Team
 
Maggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 72
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,344
Maggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden aura
Maggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden auraMaggy has a golden aura
Re: Which costs more? Tax evasion or Benefit Fraud?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem View Post
This is why we need a simpler tax system. Easier to follow, easier to police and easier to enforce with any 'acceptable'* forms of avoidance (as opposed to evasion which is already illegal) and reliefs unequivocally defined.

There's also the question of which (benefit fraud or tax evasion/avoidance) is easier to control/enforce. Unpalatable as it is, rich people and companies can currently construct and complicate their activities to take full advantage of any loopholes and it's incredibly time consuming and expensive to unravel them. This means that any savings made in recovered tax have to be offset against the costs and there's always the possibility that HMRC will lose in court and the taxpayer have to foot the bill.

A simpler benefits system would help reduce fraud and confirm/deny entitlement and that's what's currently being worked upon isn't it?

* e.g. ISA's & pension tax relief designed to encourage saving.
I'll save when the interest rates are far better than at present.
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
Maggy is offline   Reply With Quote