View Single Post
Old 05-02-2013, 00:28   #25
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Sky starting to challenge Virgin Media as second largest provider

Quote:
Originally Posted by Top banana View Post
Not sure why that's as suprise when they could provide services to 25 million homes and VM can only provide services to 12 million?
Wrong?

VM could provide services to 25 million homes too.

---------- Post added at 00:22 ---------- Previous post was at 00:22 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetman11 View Post
Don't VM also have a 'National' service which uses BT phone lines ?
Exactly

---------- Post added at 00:23 ---------- Previous post was at 00:22 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Top banana View Post
Yes but don't think it has many customers
Now why do you think that is? Seeing as it has the same "coverage", which negates your whole point completely

---------- Post added at 00:23 ---------- Previous post was at 00:23 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by craigj2k12 View Post
Still proves your point about coverage wrong
Exactly.

If VM's off-net service was any good, it would in itself be a challenger to the likes of Sky, BT, and all the other "big" xDSL ISPs

---------- Post added at 00:24 ---------- Previous post was at 00:23 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by craigj2k12 View Post


Skys FTTC service is lightyears ahead of Virgins cable service


---------- Post added at 00:28 ---------- Previous post was at 00:24 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by craigj2k12 View Post
Not to mention:
  • Mostly uncongested network
You can't really do an apples to apples comparison on that, the part of the "network" that sees most congestion problems on VM does not exist on Sky. Sky do not own or operate that part of their network.


Quote:

  • Congestion is resolved in less than a month, in some cases a week or 2
Core network congestion on VM (the only part Sky has any control over) is resolved pretty much just as quickly. I've never seen core network issues on VM last over a month.


Quote:

  • Constant low ping rates
Ermm...

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35531120-post51.html

Notice how his opinion of "decent" on Sky is nearly 40ms minimum. The worst on VM (when the network isn't broken) is 26ms, that's in the most northern reaches of their network in Scotland.

[/devil's advocate]

Consider yourself derped.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote