Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Well, that's where you and I are poles apart. You can keep your left wing, authoritarian, nanny-knows-best approach, thanks very much. I don't need the State to do my thinking for me.
Edit
Nor, for that matter, do I need the EU telling me what to think, what values are acceptable and which journalists are approved to write the news I choose to read:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...urnalists.html |
so wanting a decent press means I am left wing.
I think you are happy with lies as they suit your political swing. I didnt mention anything politically I just mentioned inaccurate stories which of course seem to be much more common in both the mail and sun than other papers, but they not the only 2 papers at it.
If a news story thats accurate is printed but I dont like the truth thats fair enough, very different to complete rubbish been printed.
Are you a journalist, as maggy has said?
---------- Post added at 19:34 ---------- Previous post was at 19:25 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
You would appear to be stating if someone has a differing opinion to you, and by highlighting what they see as potential flaws in your proposition, they must happy to be fed lies and manipulated.
Unusual viewpoint.
|
where did I say that?
newpaper articles are not meant for voicing opinions they are for reporting factual stories.
blogs are more suited to opinions yet I find blogs posting more facts than newspaper articles, its backwards.
Also if a story is proven to be trash against an individual and especially if they rich they have legal recourse.
Lets say a story is printed saying "army veterans will not be treated the same as DLA fraudsters" and you wanted to take legal action as been labeled as a fraudster whats the legal procedure for that?
---------- Post added at 19:38 ---------- Previous post was at 19:34 ----------
seems the mail pulled the article?
Quote:
Sorry...
The page you have requested does not exist or is no longer available.
|