View Single Post
Old 23-01-2013, 13:20   #10
muppetman11
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Government to stop BSkyB taking millions of pounds from BBC

I'm confused by this
Quote:
The Government will push for the fee to be scrapped so that no money changes hands. However, some industry observers think it should go further and force satellite television operators, also including Freesat, to pay public service broadcasters for the opportunity to carry their content.
Wouldn't that make it highly likely that subscriptions would increase to fund the extra charges meaning a Sky subscriber in reality would be paying more on top of the existing TV license to watch BBC content.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote