View Single Post
Old 19-01-2013, 03:12   #17
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: What router do I get for a Superhub in modem mode?

Well I suppose a direct comparison on the same phone helps, what did you have before? Incidentally I've recently found some inconsistencies between DIR-615's, with up to +/- 15dB differences between two otherwise identical routers, though I suppose leaving one out on the roof for 14 months without climate control didn't help...

I'm still quite intrigued by the these reports of "much better" wireless signal though, both the DIR-615 and the VM Superhub theoretically already transmit at the maximum legal limit, so either they're doing it really badly, or the "better signal" router is breaking the law. The latter probably wouldn't get certified for sale, so I'm really curious about what causes the former. FWIW both routers' radiation pattern is essentially (or can easily be made to be) isotropic in all directions so there shouldn't even be the possibility of "stronger signal" in one direction.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote