Thread: Superhub Superhub 2
View Single Post
Old 11-01-2013, 12:19   #68
Kushan
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,737
Kushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appeal
Kushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appealKushan has a bronzed appeal
Re: Superhub 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
It's not the one they *are* punting though, as you've said yourself.

In and ideal world everyone would be doing the best thing.

Meh, I vote the Comcast way, both in terms of SACMs and traffic management.

---------- Post added at 12:40 ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 ----------


That would be interesting to see. The existing Superhub theoretically already transmits at the legal limit. Unless I'm right, which would be bad.
It may well do, but if I recall correctly, it has either a terrible antenna or none at all (I remember someone opening one up and they found a bog standard wireless card in there - like what you'd get on a cheap laptop - please correct me if I'm wrong, though). It certainly gets sub-par range than most routers so there's room for improvement somewhere.
Kushan is offline   Reply With Quote