Thread: Superhub Superhub 2
View Single Post
Old 11-01-2013, 11:40   #67
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
Qasi, this can be viewed from many angles. You've chosen one. I could moot another.

The SH is a SACM with optional router functions to get you going while you buy your own higher spec router.

Indeed, that would be the best line for VM to punt.
It's not the one they *are* punting though, as you've said yourself.

In and ideal world everyone would be doing the best thing.

Meh, I vote the Comcast way, both in terms of SACMs and traffic management.

---------- Post added at 12:40 ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
and boost the range
That would be interesting to see. The existing Superhub theoretically already transmits at the legal limit. Unless I'm right, which would be bad.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote