Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
For "us workers" having a guaranteed source of income that is guaranteed to rise is considered flush ,as opposed to working 12 hrs a day with no pay rise for years and the risk of losing your job and security at a moments notice
no idea what that is meant to mean 
some cases? did you not see the figures posted somewhere recently?
There is no justification for JS levels to rise faster than wages ,none whatsoever
|
If you mean rise in line with inflation rather than faster yes there is. The government say that such and such an amount is the minimum to live on. Inflation rises 3% and the minimum does not grow the same then they are actually on less than they need to live on.
You workers on a decent wage ( I think the minimum wage is to low) or a living wage will be able to soak up a few quid a week a lot easier than someone with less money.
If you were to lose your job and struggle your views will most likely change
---------- Post added at 20:57 ---------- Previous post was at 20:55 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taf
Here in Cardiff they have mentioned AT LEAST 10% of the annual bill for unemployed, disabled or those on ESA. One group may not have to pay though, war pensioners.
They even had to recall the Welsh assembly (spit) from their Xmas break to get it voted in. If they had not voted it in, EVERYONE would have been liable to 100% of the bill.
|
there would have been a hell of a lot of court cases if that would have happen. Might become a bailiff