View Single Post
Old 05-01-2013, 15:57   #14
Mr_love_monkey
Inactive
 
Mr_love_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London way
Age: 50
Services: Sarcasm
Posts: 8,376
Mr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny stars
Mr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Politicians should consider banning high sugar children’s foods

Quote:
Originally Posted by heero_yuy View Post
Don't ban, just name and shame the products: Would you give your kids a breakfast "cereal" that is actually 37% sugar? Not to mention salt and fat.

Once again a brand leader pushes crap food on the population, what a surprise.
People buy it... hence they make it.

Sadly, a lot of people don't care what kind of crap they feed their kids - no one in their right mind could ever think Frosties were healthy - and how anyone can seriously believe that breakfast cereal should 'turn the milk chocolatey' (different brand I know, but the principle is the same)

Banning things is always the best option as it saves addressing the real problem - that a bunch of people are too thick to work out what a balanced healthy diet is
Mr_love_monkey is offline   Reply With Quote