|
Re: 'Austerity' at the BBC
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring
Actually, I'm not. I am, in fact, 100% correct.
Read your TV Licence  It doesn't mention the BBC anywhere.
The rest of your statement is moot as it is completely un-provable.
|
Here you go Carl
http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-i...pay-for-top13/
Quote:
|
All of this content – and the television channels, radio stations and online spaces where audiences can find it – is paid for by the licence fee, allowing BBC's UK services to remain free of advertisements and independent of shareholder and political interest.
|
---------- Post added at 22:26 ---------- Previous post was at 22:22 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
and nor does the communications act 2003 .The reason why it applies to all tv signal receivers is because it is hard to modify a tv to not receive BBC signals ,the license also covers radio and phones as well ,is it feasible to block just bbc frequencies
Put more simply if a device is capable of receiving 1 channel it will be capable of receiving all of them unless they are encrypted.
|
Which is what the BBC should be told to do, that way they will need to produce good television or close, at the moment they produce some good and lots of crap and then just hold the hat out and say "please sir give me some more"
__________________
So you all voted for Labour and now you are shocked they resort to stabbing the pensioners and disabled in the back. Shame on you.
The UK is now the regime of Kim Jong Starmer the UK's dictator
|