Quote:
Originally Posted by ferretuk
Only in the event of your link saturating. Their system is QoS like in that protocols that need to be 'real time' have a higher priority.
|
Their own graph shows that priority is given to customers who want to pay more rather than for protocols that need a higher priority. Its a pay tier system.
P2P is best effort on their lowest product, yet they also will class it as Gold traffic which is their second highest priority if you spend more with them. On a standard package only VOIP has a higher priority than gold.
So any arguments about it being for protocols that need higher priority are made null and void if customers can pay more to have their P2P traffic the same priority as other customers gaming or streaming packets.
Doesn't look like net neutrality to me.