Thread: Superhub Brand new superhub problem!
View Single Post
Old 22-12-2012, 06:25   #49
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Brand new superhub problem!

It's a slightly newer revision but the same architecture (MIPS 24K). It's only when you move to newer architectures (e.g. MIPS 74K) that you see big differences in "per megahertz" performance. The newer gen new architecture CPU in the 3600 is 20-30% faster at the same clock speed than the AR7242 so any differences between the two revisions of the same architecture will be smaller than this.

The 2543ND can be had for about £38 apparently including delivery but most places sell it for about £45. The extra full-service wireless stream on that will give you slightly improved range and reliability even on devices that can only use 2 streams.

I still think the Superhub problem is due to it being confused by MAC/ARP/IP mismatches but you would have to use Wireshark or similar to diagnose it. And you *cannot* do this using the Superhub because it *is* a switch and not a hub.

---------- Post added at 06:25 ---------- Previous post was at 06:22 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtx View Post
I still have an old cisco rack mount 20 or 24 port 100mb hub here somewhere. They were build like tanks considering their size lol.
If you want to talk size and built like tanks... How about a dozen HP 192-port 10/100 switches? That was our "pre-2007" hardware. Since then all our switches in new buildings are gigabit ported with two 10-gigabit uplinks on each floor
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote