Thread: Superhub Brand new superhub problem!
View Single Post
Old 20-12-2012, 17:50   #39
sniper007
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 480
sniper007 is a glorious beacon of lightsniper007 is a glorious beacon of lightsniper007 is a glorious beacon of lightsniper007 is a glorious beacon of lightsniper007 is a glorious beacon of lightsniper007 is a glorious beacon of lightsniper007 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Brand new superhub problem!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferretuk View Post
I've had 130Mb/s through it according to JDast...
How did you test that?

Oh...uh oh... I just found this from qasdfdsaq in another thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
a) They don't cheap out the amount of RAM they put in, they have the same or more RAM compared competitors in the same class
(e.g. TP-Link WR2543ND - 64MB vs Netgear WNDR4000 - 64MB, TP-Link WR1043ND - 32MB vs Netgear WNR3500 - 16MB, TP-Link TL-WR741ND - 32MB vs Linksys WRT120N - 32MB, TP-Link WDR4300 - 128MB, Linksys EA3500 - 64MB)
b) RAM has almost no effect whatsoever on WAN
c) Smallnetbuilder's throughput results are almost universally a load of crap.
d) TP-Link cheap out on processor speed and that does limit WAN throughput. Their firmware is also often based on very old versions of OpenWRT, which doesn't help.
Really? How so? In that they over or under estimate WAN to LAn throughput?
sniper007 is offline   Reply With Quote