Thread: Drug law reform
View Single Post
Old 10-12-2012, 18:10   #17
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Drug law reform

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
I think there is plenty of evidence that drugs like ecstacy can be as harmful if not more than fags and booze ,the task in front of the government is deciding which ones should be allowed and which ones not .

So they ask a panel of experts for their opinion. The panel of experts then give their opinion, which the government doesn't like. So they say: this wasn't quite the opinion we wanted to hear, could you go back and change your mind please? At which point the panel of experts goes: erm, no. We're experts in this, and we have this opinion because we think the available evidence supports this opinion. So the government decides that the only logical response is to fire the experts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nutt
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote