Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_
Anyone with a Superhub 1 will keep it unless they have a fault regardless of tier as they will not be replacing them with any mk 2 version due to cost.
|
of course not. I'm just saying dishing out remaining SH1s to all that have no SH will run down stock. then the new SH2 can be taken forward. there could be within the plan depending on stocks that 30meg customers get SH1 and higher tier customers get SH2. an incentive to buy higher tiers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_
I take it that you have little idea of the location of the 2 antenna in the Superhub, oddly the router it is based on has 8 all around the device, can you think why that might be, clue? to make it more omni directional.
Apart from wet dreams the has been no announcement about a potential mk 2 which in reality will be the mk 4 as 2 and 3 fell over in testing which I know from a person in the know who still works for the company.
The reason is as I have posted on quite a few occasions is down to the stupid design the company insists on using such as internal antenna due to them wanting it to be aesthetically pleasing to the eye and not much bigger than the present Superhub which gives less room for internal antenna's.
What is required is for the company to look back 3 years to when they were testing named mainstream modems both with external antenna and without and both worked according to the 2nd line guys testing them much better than the outmoded VMNG300 or the Superhub, I believe that someone took a little helper/gift from a company to make them choose the present device.
|
---------- Post added at 19:28 ---------- Previous post was at 19:27 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
I wouldn't focus on the "whatever's picked" aspect. In short order, that'll be history.
What I'd put to you in the light of your analysis is: Have VM changed their spots?
|
I think their working towards change but I also think they need help.