Thread: Superhub Superhub 2
View Single Post
Old 01-12-2012, 12:35   #77
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
I think Qasi's point is beside the point. Infinity/Sky aren't that great at the higher frequencies. When I was on 40/10, I got 38/8; when they doubled the frequency, distance mattered more and I don't get 76/18 - I get 55/10. Likewise at the next BT speed uplift will attenuate signal further. VM speed is not governed by home to cabinet distance.
My point wasn't about the service speed. More like, using your own modem and router - on most FTTC providers, easy peasy. On Sky, harder but still possible. On VM, impossible. At least on the modem part.

If as VM claim the majority of average users have no issues with the Superhub, and most of us high-end picky types would rather buy our own routers anyway, what's the point of the Superhub 2 existing to begin with?

If it's going to be given to everyone but not benefit most people anyway, is it not just a waste of money that ends up making everyone's service cost more?
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote