View Single Post
Old 29-11-2012, 17:28   #12
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Ex-VM to Sky customers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtx View Post
It does seem crazy that adsl can be more stable than a fibre connection
Not crazy at all, more perfectly normal and to be expected. VM's service is not fibre to the home, and the primary difference is ADSL gives you a dedicated line to the provider's backbone whereas on VM you share one line with hundreds to thousands of other people.

Perfectly normal to expect a dedicated line to be more stable than one shared with ~500 other users

---------- Post added at 17:28 ---------- Previous post was at 17:26 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skie View Post
I've always wondered why, when VM were allowed to market it as fibre because part of their network was fibre, BT never started advertising their own ADSL products as fibre. Their exchanges have fibre links so it would be just as tenuous as Virgins current claims.
I've argued that a few times before. I guess BT just isn't into false advertising as much as VM is
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote