Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu
At the present time Sky have more channels ....
|
Okay.
Quote:
|
and a better quality of CS
|
Debatable. Some are okay. Some are not.
Quote:
|
and the technology is better than VM.
|
Wrong. Tivo is better than anything Sky has. VM's OD is also far superior in terms of delivery if not content
Quote:
|
What can VM justify, we had a promise from them that we would have better HD channels, more HD channels from ITV, this has been proved on this forum has false.
|
Please cite where this was
promised by VM.
Quote:
|
Members are getting frustrated at the lack of more HD channels
|
Some members.
Quote:
|
the promises from VM at more channels joining the network.
|
Can you guarantee that they aren't, ever?
Quote:
|
As a consumer, l have to choose what is right at the right price for myself, finances are tight and therefore, you go to the best supplier. The prices and comments l have read on here is quite staggering, considering the prices that l have seen.
|
Bye then!
---------- Post added at 12:30 ---------- Previous post was at 12:27 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat
I do agree with Ben on that one. That doesn't mean that we don't want more, but given that Sky charge £10.25, just for non premium channel HD content, it's not too surprising that Sky have more than VM.
|
To be fair to Sky, that does include the HD Movie channels (and sport, probably) as well. That said, that Sky force VM to charge extra for them so why am I trying to "be fair" again?
