Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20218094
And us women get flack for protesting about page 3 wimmen... 
I say if we have female nudes everywhere then why not a few more penises on view?
Also is it women complaining or men? 
|
looks like a cheap statement for shock factor, but art, I don't agree it is anything to do with art.
As for page 3, I think that is long overdue to be cancelled, I don't think it is needed anymore. Before you had models that made a career from Page 3, then went on to other things. Nowadays its a different model everyday, so all they're getting a is a couple of quid with no guarantee of anything else afterwards, feels outdated and cheap today.
I don't agree that we have naked woman on show everywhere, topless is different to full nudity. If this exhitbition was showing full female nudity for public viewing then it'll be just as controversial.
Personally full nudity in an art form is good and nothing wrong with it, but for a cheap stunt I don't think it'll go down well being male or female. It's not as if nudity, sex and porn is needed to be shown in public these days when you have the internet.