Thread: TiVo Vm v BT v (& Sky)
View Single Post
Old 14-11-2012, 17:09   #3
thenry
XIV
 
thenry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crawley
Age: 35
Services: Three Unlimited
Posts: 14,913
thenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny star
thenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny starthenry has a nice shiny star
Re: Vm v BT v (& Sky)

VM does not beat BT on fibre broadband qaulity. the speeds issue is balanced. VM lack capacity. BT lack the ability to hand all customers upto 76down/ upto 19up due to distance. as soon as BT FTTP is rolling out here, there and everywhere then there will be a real advantage for BT. Sky too I guess.

as for channels. BT have rights to broadcast the Prem which they will use to get Sky channels in exchange for BT sports. you could say Sky have a solid hand with BT needing to sell their sport channel(s) but make no mistake Sky needs BT Sports and BT needs Sky HD channels.

---------- Post added at 17:08 ---------- Previous post was at 17:02 ----------

right now Sky have the upper hand in my opinion. channels plus fibre broadband. its just a shame Sky have the router issue where you cant properly use your own choice of router.

---------- Post added at 17:09 ---------- Previous post was at 17:08 ----------

as for digital boxes clearly the TiVo is winner.
thenry is offline   Reply With Quote