View Single Post
Old 14-11-2012, 16:34   #21
RichardCoulter
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,793
RichardCoulter is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: You can't get me I'm part of the Union........

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_ View Post
Once the is a high enough percentage they legally have to recognise trade unions so this is just a way they are hoping to get out of having to legally recognise unions, as above all this will do is enforce the need for union membership and will backfire on the company.

---------- Post added at 06:30 ---------- Previous post was at 06:23 ----------


Get real the company tried to close the Albert Dock in an underhand way not realising that they would be caught with their trousers down and will be punished for their high handedness in a few weeks time.

This is the real reason for the company desperately trying to undermine union membership before the unfavourable result comes out which will result in a sharp rise in new members of the CWU as they realise it is the way to go.

If anyone is stupid enough to believe anything this company says and decides to drop their membership then they will just be giving this company a remit to ride roughshod over any agreements already in place.

I and all my ex colleagues and CWU union members from the Albert Dock are awaiting the result of the tribunal with bated breath as the evidence against the company is overwhelming, a little bit of bad publicity for Virgin Media just before Christmas will be our perfect gift at that time.
Gloating born out of sour grapes is never a pleasant trait to witness.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius View Post
Well we have a interesting few weeks ahead i feel. Cannot wait to see the out come of the vote.
I'm surprised to see you Sirius, last time I encountered you, you said you were changing your name

Anyway, do you believe that VM need to continue to recognise the CWU, even though you believe that they are an excellent employer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Top banana View Post
I might be being thick here but looking on google it suggests you worked for Adecco not VM ? My last comment on the subject as it appears very personal to you, would be - you are only hearing one side of the story and a court will hear both - good luck hope it works out the way you want
Yes, it was agency work he was doing for Adecco as opposed to being employed by VM.

I agree with your sentiments, he does appear to be "counting his chickens before they are hatched"
RichardCoulter is offline