View Single Post
Old 07-11-2012, 18:03   #2627
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Quote:
Originally Posted by roughbeast View Post
I'm not yet convinced by your view on the sharpness of the onset. On my TBB graph there was a normal profile until something like 7.50 pm. By 8.15 pm the blip was at its peak. Admittedly the decline at the other end of the blip was virtually instant, but I would have expected a much more gradual onset if collective human behaviour is the only cause. ie thousands of users caning their connections soon after they get home from work somewhere around 6.00 pm.
I've said so before, and iggi's said it on TBB. That's not how it works. Read this post:

http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/vir...y-tonight.html

For the lazy, this is what "natural" congestion saturating a link normally looks like:

On O2's core network

On VM's core network

On VM's edge/border (the last "Altroto" incident):


This is an example Thinkbroadband posted on their own FAQ page as "A classic example of peak time [congestion] affecting latency, and suggests the provider in question is running its links at very close to capacity"



Another example from Thinkbroadband's own FAQ, this time "what effect a heavily congested link from an exchange to the wider internet can have" (in this case Sky):



In comparison to your graph:
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote