Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
You should probably save those before they disappear
|
Wish the "peering bump" on Linx would disappear from that live snapshot as quick, but if that was a serious suggestion then I still have access to the "history/previous days" snapshots anyway!
Also judging from DB133's Hub stats he kindly supplied via his other thread it appears "brig17" also had it's UBG implemented around 9am yesterday morning. Although I note with interest it's using US1(35.8MHz) and US2 (27.4MHz) on Davids BN1 node (but then I suspect my BN3 nodes still have an outstanding SNR/FEC issue on US1 anyway)
That hopefully completes all 3 D3 chassis (AFAIK) in Brighton and assuming VM have sensibly configured Load Balance Groups one hopes a significant improvement in upstream utilisation problems….
Time will tell….
---------- Post added at 05:57 ---------- Previous post was at 05:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtx
Brighton has been broken for about 18 months, in a similar way to Bristol. Unbelievable VM's fix times...
|
Can't speak about Bristol but some will attest to variable "hot/not spots" utilisation issues in Brighton for years!….
Accompanied by much cynical discrediting of VM's "planning permissions" reasons for protracted delays. Regarding the latter, just out of interest, I'm currently awaiting a "Freedom of Information" response I submitted recently regarding VM's previous and planned "Street Works" from B&H council.