View Single Post
Old 04-11-2012, 18:33   #136
muppetman11
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,313
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
muppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny starsmuppetman11 has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Poor choice of Channels

Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY View Post
I agree, passingbat. VM could do more with HD channels, but many of the channels Sky has that we don't are not worth a light.

Sky could offer 2,000 channels, but if none of them contain content worth watching, what's the point?
I consider many of the HD channels Sky provide that VM don't worth while , channels like Sky Sports 3,4 HD , Sky Atlantic HD , Nat Geo Wild HD , ESPNA HD , Universal HD , ITV 4 HD , MGM HD , TCM HD , Eurosport 2 HD etc. You may very well be happy watching those channels in SD and thats the individuals choice however some of us aren't as ever it's down to the individuals specific requirements.
muppetman11 is offline   Reply With Quote