View Single Post
Old 02-11-2012, 21:42   #24
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Foreign Office's antique anaconda cost £10,000 to re-stuff

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J View Post
Sorry I should have remembered Hirst's shark..But even then I did ask what a shark in formaldehyde had to do with art.

So what does a stuffed snake have to do with art?
I'm not sure if you're deliberately or genuinely obtuse.

Many people will question the purpose of art, and whether we should spend public money on it. Many people will question the purpose of re-stuffing a Victorian era Anaconda. Neither serves a practical purpose. Some things are worth keeping just for quirkiness. They might be considered art in future. If an art teacher thinks quirky things aren't worth investing in, then I have little hope for the future of art.
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote