View Single Post
Old 02-11-2012, 21:12   #60
Derek
Inactive
 
Derek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Glasgow
Services: SkyHD and Broadband
Posts: 9,158
Derek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny stars
Derek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny starsDerek has a pair of shiny stars
Re: fewer prosecutions for emergency services

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem View Post
I reckon every second they can save (without being negligent) is vital and I think most sensible people realise this.
The default position seems to be charge the driver and let the courts decide. A little while back I was involved in an incident where a child ran out between two parked car into the side of my marked car.

I was going less than 20 MPH and there was (thankfully) only a minor injury to the kid. I was investigated by the local supervisors and the local traffic dept and found to be not at fault.

Two weeks later a Chief Inspector demanded I get charged with driving without due care and attention! Luckily my boss at the time fought my corner and I didn't end up on a charge but thats what the emergency services are up against, basically any accident will end up with someone trying to either make a name for themselves or avoid any accusation of a cover-up.
Derek is offline   Reply With Quote