Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
No. First of all no one with any knowledge is offering first-hand accusations of covering things up. Whereas we have several people, most not connected to each other, saying Savile abused them. We've already been though the issue of victim's testimony counting as evidence - it does.
|
and i've accepted that ,so if we accept that and count that as credible evidence then other accusations such as those levelled at the BBC in general must be true because otherwise the former could not have happened, the only question in my eyes is how much the high up in the BBC turned a blind eye ,and it appears to be a lot
.I agree with Chris in that the DG did not deliberately cover up evidence but colluded by not bothering to follow up on the initial investigation by newsnight,or failing by gross incompetence to realise what was being uncovered so yes he must be guilty and must be hung out to dry