View Single Post
Old 16-10-2012, 22:07   #87
Safcftm21
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 88
Safcftm21 is a jewel in the roughSafcftm21 is a jewel in the roughSafcftm21 is a jewel in the roughSafcftm21 is a jewel in the roughSafcftm21 is a jewel in the rough
Re: Poor choice of Channels

Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetman11 View Post
I've already looked Sky attracted 10,100 new TV subscribers from Jun 11 to Jun 12 in the same period VM TV numbers remained unchanged however they did take their TIVO userbase from 34,000 in Q2 11 to 939,000 which is a phenomenal achievement they also added 38,000 to a pay TV tier presumably from M TV again impressive , Sky upgraded 521,000 to HD and added another 152,00 multiroom subs. The VM presentation reported a net cable customer loss of 15,000 , Sky reported a total customer increase of 312,000 across all its product range.

Both companies TV results would suggest Pay TV subscriber numbers have reached a plateau , however both companies are producing good figures by enticing customers to upgrade to premium products.
Looking at these numbers do you now think that VM should stop spending a massive amount of money of marketing and spend it on new channels. I alone get about three pieces of mail a week from them and as I work in the industry I can tell you this kind of thing doesn't come cheap. If they have increased subscribers to the extent you've stated then maybe it should now start looking after it's current customers? Just a thought.

Also what exactly is all the hype about the Tivo box that you don't get with the sky box, other than three tuners? I willing to learn here in-case I'm missing out on some wonders that I've not found.
Safcftm21 is offline   Reply With Quote