View Single Post
Old 15-10-2012, 18:12   #23
Arthurgray50@blu
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Re: Poor choice of Channels

At least the poster is telling the truth, and it had to Hugh to tell him to go back to Sky, Hugh must have shares in VM.

Since l have been with VM, the customer has said what it wants, but VM won't get them, look how long it took VM to get the basic channels back, look at the HD channels they have compared to Sky.

VM are cheaper, but they give us channels that some customers don't want, they are 'always in talks'.

And why waste money getting +1 channels, they would do better by getting good quality channels before them.
Arthurgray50@blu is offline   Reply With Quote