Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
How? Such a claim could only succeed if it could be proved that the stories being written about Saville were intended to harm the ongoing business interests of his estate, and had actually done so. "Malicious falsehood" isn't simply an interchangeable complaint that remains available in circumstances where a claim of libel is not. It is quite different.
|
these stories if false are harming his estate, so much so his charitable trust are dropping his name perhaps and speaking of libelling the dead how did the Watson case turn out in your neck of the woods.