View Single Post
Old 06-10-2012, 00:03   #262
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,363
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
re: Operation Yewtree

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
My god are you lot taking the pee , have you not ever heard of evidence we do not and never have relied only on "i say he raped me" we insist on verifiable evidence .In this case it would rely on dates and times that could be verified or witness evidence from someone not connected that saw him do what he is accused of .In your example the police would want fingerprints or other physical evidence they would not rely on your word the same as they do not rely on the word of a rape victim

Thank god you lot aren't in charge of justice in this country
How would dates and times being verified, prove anything one way or another. Even DNA evidence is not definitive proof because it doesn't show context. If a criminal wore gloves and left behind no DNA, would that mean that no crime had taken place? How many abuse and rape convictions have(and could have) verifiable evidence?
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote