Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary L
From what I've read. he was investigated for it.
it's intersting because if it is true then there must have been another celebrity who was aware of it going on.
and of course persons at the BBC.
|
Apparently, it was an "open secret".
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
And accusing somebody whilst they are still alive, and are unable to disprove allegations is any better? Should we summarily dismiss all "he said, she said" types of allegations on that basis?
The papers are merely reporting what will be in a TV programme, so criticising them for it, is complete prejudiced and blinkered nonsense(no surprise there  ).
Some of the the initial allegations were made at the time and ignored or covered up.
He was approached before Jimmy Savile died. The fact that the full investigation didn't start until after his death, seems to be more of a coincidence than anything else.
It is not just these women making accusations. |
Indeed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMG
Should have been sorted when he was alive & able to defend himself. He`s dead, let it go.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad
If there is evidence which confirms he was a paedophile it shouldn't matter if he is dead or alive. Paedophilia is indefensible.
|
I agree, people should be exposed if they are guilty of sexually abusing children, dead or alive.